Home » Road cycling history » History of the one-day classics » The controversial finish of Paris-Roubaix 1936

The controversial finish of Paris-Roubaix 1936

The 1936 Paris-Roubaix is remembered for one of the most controversial finishes in the  history of road cycling.

The dispute over who actually crossed the finish line first led to heated debates, protests, and accusations that lingered long after the race ended.

Paris-Roubaix, often called “The Hell of the North,” is one of the most challenging one-day cycling races in the world. Roubaix, then a small town nearby, now one of the suburbs of the  industrial hub Lille in Northern France, welcomed the first finish in 1896.

The 1936 edition featured the usual treacherous cobblestones, unpredictable weather, and a fiercely competitive field of riders. Among the favorites were Georges Speicherand Romain Maes of Belgium, two former Tour de France winners from previous years. As the race progressed, it became clear that the final victory would come down to a sprint finish between them. The two riders battled fiercely as they approached the famous Roubaix Velodrome, where the finish line awaited.

As Speicher and Maes lunged for the line,

it was nearly impossible to determine who had crossed first.

The technology of the time did not include the precise photo-finish cameras used today, so race officials had to rely on their own observations and manual timing.

Two cyclists crossing the finish line almost at the same time at the controversial finish of Paris-Roubaix 1936

Immediately after the finish, confusion set in. Some spectators and journalists claimed that Romain Maes had won, while others believed Speicher had the edge. Belgian supporters, in particular, were adamant that Maes had been robbed of victory.

However, the

officials declared Georges Speicher the winner,

sparking outrage among Belgian fans and cycling experts.

The decision led to immediate protests from the Belgian camp, who argued that Maes had clearly finished ahead. Some even suggested that favoritism played a role in awarding the victory to Speicher, as he was French, and the race was organized by a French body. Newspapers from Belgium and France published conflicting reports, adding to the controversy.

Without a definitive way to settle the matter, the official result remained unchanged, and Speicher was credited with the victory. However, many cycling fans and historians still debate whether the result was fair.



Read more Paris-Roubaix stories